Nedrept
Documented factF-40e
ActorCEDO
Person and caseCristi Danileț, judecător la Tribunalul Cluj
Evidenceofficial
Stateconfirmed
Sources1 source
stage 8Context
01

What happened

Au formulat opinie separată judecătorii Kucsko-Stadlmayer, Eicke și Bormann, iar judecătorul Răduleţu a formulat opinie concordantă.

Context: explains the case, not a step in it.

02

The sources of the fact

For each source, you can check the original, the archived capture and, when available, the fingerprint of the private copy preserved by Nedrept.

  • S-03official

    CEDO, Secția a IV-a, Danileţ c. Roumanie (nr. 16915/21), hotărârea din 20.02.2024 (FR)

    Issuer
    Curtea Europeană a Drepturilor Omului
    Published
    20 February 2024
    Type
    official

    private copy: SHA-256 37f7c68f9542e923f293e0974e79a3a56b7728d9ac06951dac668146416a1122, downloaded 7 November 2026

03

Cite this fact

Cristi Danileț, judecător la Tribunalul Cluj, F-40e, 20 February 2024. Nedrept, https://nedrept.ro/en/cases/cristi-danilet/f-40e/ (verified 7 November 2026)